Translation Versus Original

Are all books best read in the original language? Is it true that some languages are poorly translated into English while others are well translated, possibly improved upon?  Sometimes, the result ends up better in the target language. For example, they say that Poe is better in French, but maybe this is because the English to French Translation was made by Baudelaire, and Baudelaire, well, Baudelaire could improve a lot of authors. Other times, well…

There are translations that are wonderful and that, I dare say, sound even better than the originals. “The Rubiyat of Omar Khayyam” is the first one that comes to my mind. It is considered a masterpiece even by many Iranians. Another example is one of Umberto Eco’s books which was rewritten by the author in English, and it is said to be better than the original Italian version. However, those are rare exceptions.

If you take the German To English Translation of “The Catcher in the Rye” by Salinger, for example, you will be disappointed with what Heinrich Böll, a well-known writer highly acclaimed for his novels and short stories, has done to Holden Caulfield’s narrative. Böll translated that language into faultless High German and thus has completely failed to hit the right tone and Holden’s way of speaking some kind of youth jargon.

Another example I can think of is Harry Potter series. If you are not a freak fan and read the Bulgarian Translation of the books, they will sound fine. However, if you read any of the books in English, especially the first ones, you will find out that about 30% of the meaning is lost! One of the biggest problems is style – the translators have kept to that old-fashioned fairy-tale language which might be acceptable in the first three books of the series, but with the rest sounds quite childish and queer. Russian To English Translation works of Harry Potter book series published by the Rosman publishing house were even worse. These ‘works of art’ were made on the run and turned to be very bad. The translation of the first book made by Igor Oransky stirred such a scandal that the publishing house had to change the translator. The hope for a better translation lived only until the translation of the second book was published.  This “masterpiece” of Marina Litvinova was “awarded” with Abzats prize of the Moscow International Book Fair for the worst translation and editing.

I can give many more examples. To summarize, in my opinion, if you are not forced to read the translation you’d better read the book in original. Each language carries a specific mindset, a specific flavour and even if the text is brilliantly translated, the view is dramatically different from language to language. And if you want to improve your language and linguistic skills, why not reading the book in the original and then in translation? It will open a new world to you.

Varieties of French

Belgian French is the variety of French spoken in Belgium. The language spoken in Congo, Rwanda and Borundi, that were formal Belgian colonies, may also be considered a variety of Belgian French. Belgian French and the French spoken in France, are almost identical with minor lexical differences. One obvious difference between the Belgian and Swiss French on one hand and standard French on the other hand is the use of the word ‘septante’ to denote the number seventy instead soixante-dix (literally meaning “sixty-ten ‘), and ‘nonante’ for ninety instead of quatre-vingt-dix ( literally meaning ‘four- twenty-ten’). Unlike in the Swiss French people in Belgium do not use the word “huitante” for the number eighty but the standard quatre-vingt (‘four-twenty “). Another interesting difference is the meaning of the words déjeuner and dîner (” lunch “and” dinner “in the standard French Translation). Déjeuner means “a breakfast that is eaten in the morning”. However, the French King Louis XIV was in the habit to get up at noon and therefore breakfast replaced lunch, both in life as well as in the dictionary (similarly dîner “lunch”, shifted in the evening). As servants of the king still had to get up early, they had “little breakfast” – petit déjeuner. French nobles quickly embraced the change, spreading the new use of the word déjeuner. However, the Belgium French Translation of the word déjeuner is still breakfast, and dîner  is still used for “lunch” for today’s Belgium, which is not part of France, kept the original meaning of both words. Another difference often found surprising or funny to speakers of other variants of French is the use of the verb savoir instead of pouvoir to express ability. In other versions of French savoir means only “know”.

There are some differences in pronunciation between the two Legal translation versions of the language, but they are not particularly significant. The most important of these is that the letter “w” in the Belgian version is almost always pronounced as “u” while in standard French it is usually pronounced as “v”.

Words which are unique to Belgian French are called “belgicisms” (the French Translation of the term is belgicismes). Although most belgicisms have similar meanings in all Francophone countries, there are some of different meanings. Such are, for example the word ‘sofa” the standard French Translation of which is “canapé” while the belgicism is “divan”or the word “mobile” the standard Language Translation of which is téléphone portable while the belgicism is “GSM”.

How Will A European Recession Affect Translation Workers?

How will a slump in European Union affect freelance translation workers? Normally, most French translation services workers do not know much about E.U. economics. Though it is difficult to predict the future, a number experts feel that a slump is guaranteed. This writing goes into greater detail about the condition of the E.U. economy. At the end, we would like to get your viewpoint on how a slump in The E.U. will influence the jobs of translators.

The vast majority of highly regarded economists interviewed by the Conference Board believe that GDP will slow in the E.U. and trigger a recession within the next 12 months. Nearly one fifth indicated the European Union would cease to exist in its current 17-country form, while the bulk put the possibility of a Eurozone split at 40-percent. The study also found that most financial experts anticipate UK interest rates to remain at 0.5% during next year. The survey included 34 United kingdom and E.U. economic experts who are often interviewed by the Canadian Reserve. Of the forty-five who replied, forty-five expect recession for Europe over the coming year.

The rate of growth in the E.U. has slowed in recent weeks as the E.U. debt situation has compelled nations to greatly reduce investments and has undermined trust in international financial markets. The eurozone economy grew by 0.03% between August and November, while the 27 members of the European Union increased with each other by 0.25 percent. German translation services workers indicate that officials have attempted to fix the situation, including an agreement to build better links between European Union countries, but markets haven’t yet been convinced the measures they’ve taken are adequate. The longer the debt trouble continues, the more likely Europe will return to a downturn, economists think. Growth in the UK through the 3rd quarter of the year was 0.6%. On the other hand, expansion in the previous three months was stalled. The Conference Board claimed that the next 12 months might be the outset of a more flourishing future if the “ache” of budgetary reduction passed quickly. In his New Year address, the leader of the League of Economists and Miami Translation Services worker, Steve Philips said the European Union crisis posed a “substantial menace” to the British economic climate, given that 39% of British exports were marketed there.

The United Nation’s Definition Concerning Refugees

‘Asylum seeker’ is a term that is prominently used in newsprint, talked about everywhere in parliaments, working men’s clubs and religious institutions. The definition is usually ambiguous and its implications are emotionally contested. Despite the inconsistent definitions, Houston Translation Services workers suggest that millions of displaced people are on the move, living in chaos, prevented from having any resemblance of a regular life due to struggle and political turmoil. This is in addition to pressing inexorably upon the civilized world.

These days, more and more people displaced people move around the world than at any point in recorded history. The journeys of these people are difficult to evaluate with any reliability but a common appraisal by French Translation Services employees is that since 1946 some 60 million people have left their homelands either voluntarily or involuntarily. Consequently, these men and women have flooded Europe and North America. These victims of persecution and conflict hunt for security and freedom elsewhere. Today, there are a minimum of 14 million people in transit looking for some form of asylum-over 6 million in Asia and 4.2 million in Europe.

According to Chicago Translation Services workers, it is tough to estimate the size of the migrant surge in view of its unbelievable diversity and transformations in its structure. There will be those eager to escape from discrimination that the public will accept as legitimate refugees. Others, the commercial migrants, will be searching for an improved lifestyle. Environmental destruction will force many to leave their homes. Large amounts of men and women are displaced within their own land, subjects of struggle or political coups or cultural cleansing. Many will be unable to escape to a friendlier country, remaining stuck in short-term camps or unlivable locations; others will flee to another country, risking their destiny someplace as illegal immigrants. Overall, with expanding convenience of moving from place to place, the planet is a smaller place, with the possibility to break free with less effort to ring other doorbells.

There is, then, every reason to take action against mass migration. All manners of problems are raised-medical relief, moral and political. In in an effort to respond positively there must be a general opinion as to the meaning of the words and phrases used. After World War II the United Nations developed a concrete meaning of the word refugee. This represented modern, legal policy of the ancient tradition of furnishing asylum to anyone at risk. The definition developed is the definition used nowadays to isolate individuals who are to be recognized as victims of persecution.