Though the benefits of embracing and developing a localization strategy to a foreign lifestyle are clear, it can be overdone. A firm should realize that there are actually boundaries that a localization strategy should not step outside in order to accommodate a foreign market.
Base on the opinions of a few some Chicago Russian Translation professionals in localization organizations, there are good reasons to avoid localization tactics all together. For one thing, it is imperative that you recognize that when a country is prepared for change, an alternative way of life could very well be desirable. This is easiest to see in the formerly Soviet Union. Russians want real Americans, not tailored editions. They can undertake the adaptation on their own and count on the “genuine thing.” The politically ordered adjustments in these countries have worn away the old norms and have established new ways. Here, seeking to conform will be an error, because the market wants a product from a profitable international culture. Thus, it is important that the strategic planning team manager to understand the historical and human perspective in which the organization’s promotional transactions are taking place.
Yet Houston French Translation workers suggest that in many cases, localization and adaptation strategies for other cultures can easily seem shallow and lack substance and sincerity. Essentially, it creates the same effect as flattery, by being vulnerable to misinterpretation and suspicion. Conversely, a business that wants to be successful in foreign must present a genuine appearance. Yet, companies that become too concerned with localization can often find it hard to be transparent, trustworthy, and spontaneous. For these companies, it becomes simple lose their bearings.
In the long run, adaptation to the customer’s culture, while a fine touch, should never interfere with the innate merits of the proposition. The thought that one should let personal likes and dislikes influence a business partnership, so popular in the very first discussions of European, Japanese, and even American trade, has been deemed inefficient in the open competition in international markets.